Editing Protein

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
[[File:2xfr b amylase.png|thumb|3D representation of β-amylase enzyme structure]]
[[File:2xfr b amylase.png|thumb|3D representation of β-amylase enzyme structure]]


Proteins are a versatile substance required for all forms of life. They consist of long chains built from an assortment of different [[amino acids]] joined by "peptide links". When a protein is being built, the chain is folded into a particular 3-dimensional structure, and this structure is the basis for its function. Examples of function include building, degrading, or modifying other molecules (i.e. [[enzymes]]), maintaining cellular structure, or transporting molecules across the cell membrane. Proteins may be combined with various other molecules, such as [[sugars]] in the case of [[glycoproteins]], or various other groups (such as [[iron]]) in the cases of some enzymes.<ref name=bsp>Briggs DE, Boulton CA, Brookes PA, Stevens R. [[Library|''Brewing Science and Practice.'']] Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC; 2004.</ref>
Proteins are a versatile substance required for all forms of life. They consist of long chains built from an assortment of different [[amino acids]] joined by "peptide links". When a protein is being built, the chain is folded into a particular 3-dimensional structure, and this structure is the basis for its function. Examples of function include building, degrading, or modifying other molecules (i.e. [[enzymes]]), maintaining cellular structure, or transporting molecules across the cell membrane. Proteins may be combined with various other molecules, such as [[sugars]] in the case of [[glycoproteins]], or various other groups (such as [[iron]]) in the cases of some enzymes.<ref name=bsp/>


The cereal [[grain]]s used in [[brewing]] contain a substantial amount of protein, second only to [[starch]].<ref name=yu>Yu W, Zhai H, Xia G, et al. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224420306002 Starch fine molecular structures as a significant controller of the malting, mashing, and fermentation performance during beer production.] ''Trends Food Sci Technol.'' 2020;105:296–307.</ref> Thousands of different proteins have been detected in wort, and these proteins and their degradation products are important factors in beer quality. They are influenced, modified, and aggregated throughout the whole [[malting]] and brewing process.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=kerr/> Arguably the most important proteins in the [[malt]] are the [[enzymes]] responsible for various functions during [[mashing]]. Some of the malt protein is broken down by proteolytic enzymes, and the protein degradation products are responsible for beer [[foam]] and mouthfeel while others are utilized by the [[yeast]] as a source of nitrogen (to build their own proteins).<ref name=bsp/><ref name=kunze>Kunze W, Hendel O, eds. [[Library|''Technology Brewing & Malting.'']] 6th ed. VLB Berlin; 2019.</ref><ref name=fix/> Indirectly, the proportions of protein components affect the flavors produced by yeast during fermentation. The color of the beer is influenced by [[Maillard reaction]]s between the sugars and protein components during the [[boiling|boil]], which give rise to color and flavor compounds. Proteins also serve as a natural layer of protection against [[oxidation]]. Not all proteins are beneficial however; some enzymes cause unwanted effects, other proteins may contribute to beer [[haze]] (in combination with [[phenolic compounds]]), some may cause [[lautering]] problems, and some proteins can have negative health effects on certain beer drinkers (e.g. hordein, a "[[gluten-free beer|gluten]]" protein from barley). Stemming from protein degradation, the nitrogen level in the final beer can also affect its susceptibility to the growth of contaminating organisms.  
The cereal [[grain]]s used in [[brewing]] contain a substantial amount of protein, second only to [[starch]].<ref name=yu>Yu W, Zhai H, Xia G, et al. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224420306002 Starch fine molecular structures as a significant controller of the malting, mashing, and fermentation performance during beer production.] ''Trends Food Sci Technol.'' 2020;105:296–307.</ref> Thousands of different proteins have been detected in wort, and these proteins and their degradation products are important factors in beer quality. They are influenced, modified, and aggregated throughout the whole [[malting]] and brewing process.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=kerr/> Arguably the most important proteins in the [[malt]] are the [[enzymes]] responsible for various functions during [[mashing]]. Some of the malt protein is broken down by proteolytic enzymes, and the protein degradation products are responsible for beer [[foam]] and mouthfeel while others are utilized by the [[yeast]] as a source of nitrogen (to build their own proteins).<ref name=bsp/><ref name=kunze>Kunze W, Hendel O, eds. [[Library|''Technology Brewing & Malting.'']] 6th ed. VLB Berlin; 2019.</ref><ref name=fix/> Indirectly, the proportions of protein components affect the flavors produced by yeast during fermentation. The color of the beer is influenced by [[Maillard reaction]]s between the sugars and protein components during the [[boiling|boil]], which give rise to color and flavor compounds. Proteins also serve as a natural layer of protection against [[oxidation]]. Not all proteins are beneficial however; some enzymes cause unwanted effects, other proteins may contribute to beer [[haze]] (in combination with [[phenolic compounds]]), some may cause [[lautering]] problems, and some proteins can have negative health effects on certain beer drinkers (e.g. hordein, a "[[gluten-free beer|gluten]]" protein from barley). Stemming from protein degradation, the nitrogen level in the final beer can also affect its susceptibility to the growth of contaminating organisms.  


The structures of proteins are somewhat delicate. At high temperature, protein molecules become "denatured"—they unfold, losing their shape and therefore their function. Protein function can also be damaged by [[shear]] forces or inactivated by high or low [[pH testing|pH levels]]. Large proteins typically are either broken down by enzymes in the mash or they eventually precipitate (coagulate) during [[mashing]], [[boiling]], [[wort chilling|chilling]], or [[yeast|fermentation]]. Medium and small proteins, protein fragments, and amino acids are typically what pass to the final beer, affecting its sensory characteristics. However some malt proteins or modified products partly survive mashing and boiling and appear in the final beer relatively unchanged.<ref name=adb>Narziss L, Back W, Gastl M, Zarnkow M. [[Library|''Abriss der Bierbrauerei.'']] 8th ed. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017.</ref><ref name=bsp/>
The structures of proteins are somewhat delicate. At high temperature, protein molecules become "denatured"—they unfold, losing their shape and therefore their function. Protein function can also be damaged by [[shear force]]s or inactivated by high or low [[pH testing|pH levels]]. Large proteins typically are either broken down by enzymes in the mash or they eventually precipitate (coagulate) during [[mashing]], [[boiling]], [[wort chilling|chilling]], or [[yeast|fermentation]]. Medium and small proteins, protein fragments, and amino acids are typically what pass to the final beer, affecting its sensory characteristics. However some malt proteins or modified products partly survive mashing and boiling and appear in the final beer relatively unchanged.<ref name=adb>Narziss L, Back W, Gastl M, Zarnkow M. [[Library|''Abriss der Bierbrauerei.'']] 8th ed. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017.</ref><ref name=bsp/>


The words '''peptides''' or polypeptides refer to fragments of proteins consisting of smaller chains of amino acids, generally without a defined 3-dimensional structure.<ref name=fix/>
The words '''peptides''' or polypeptides refer to fragments of proteins consisting of smaller chains of amino acids, generally without a defined 3-dimensional structure.<ref name=fix/>


==Proteins in grain==
==Proteins in grain==
The mature [[barley]] grain contains a spectrum of proteins that differ in function, location, structure, and other physical and chemical characteristics. The level of protein is a critical aspect of the quality of [[malt]] and [[beer]], and it is influenced by [[grain]] variety, soil conditions, crop rotation, fertilization, and weather conditions.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=picariello/><ref name=mahalingam/> Generally, the protein content in barley grain represents approximately 8–16% of its total mass.<ref name=mashing>Evans E. [[Library|''Mashing.'']]  American Society of Brewing Chemists and Master Brewers Association of the Americas; 2021.</ref><ref name=silva>Silva F, Nogueira LC, Goncalves C, Ferreira AA, Ferreira IMPLVO, Teixeira N. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814607006085 Electrophoretic and HPLC methods for comparative study of the protein fractions of malts, worts and beers produced from Scarlett and Prestige barley (''Hordeum vulgare'' L.) varieties.] ''Food Chem.'' 2008;106(2):820–829.</ref><ref name=mahalingam>Mahalingam R. [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-016-3408-5 Shotgun proteomics of the barley seed proteome.] ''BMC Genomics.'' 2017;18(44).</ref> Brewers prefer lower protein levels as long as there is plenty of soluble nitrogen for good yeast nutrition and beer foam potential.<ref name=crit>Bamforth CW, Fox GP. [https://www.brewingscience.de/index.php?tpl=table_of_contents&year=2020&edition=0009%2F0010&article=92781 Critical aspects of starch in brewing.] ''BrewingScience.'' 2020;73(9/10):126–139.</ref> This is because excessive protein content decreases the relative amount of [[carbohydrates]] (mainly [[starch]]) and also has other negative influences on the [[brewing]] process.<ref name=yu/> The barley used for [[malting]] should generally fall at the lower end of this range, with about 9–11% protein.<ref name=fix/><ref>Yu W, Tao K, Gidley MJ, Fox GP, Gilbert RG. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328971139_Molecular_brewing_Molecular_structural_effects_involved_in_barley_malting_and_mashing Molecular brewing: Molecular structural effects involved in barley malting and mashing.] ''Carbohydr Polym.'' 2019;206:583–592.</ref> Six-row barley tends to have more protein content and thus less starch than two-row.<ref name=mahalingam/> Hordeins (storage proteins) are the most abundant proteins found in a barley grain, and they form a matrix around the [[starch]] granules, increasing grain hardness.<ref name=celus>Celus I, Brijs K, Delcour JA. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0733521006000762 The effects of malting and mashing on barley protein extractability.] ''J Cereal Sci.'' 2006;44(2):203–211.</ref><ref name=iimure/> These storage proteins are created specifically to be broken down and used as a source of amino acids for building other proteins during seed germination, facilitating the plant's growth.<ref name=mashing/> A large variety of other proteins are present in barley, with over a thousand unique proteins identified.<ref name=kerr>Kerr ED, Fox GP, Schulz BL. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081005965228692 Grass to glass: Better beer through proteomics.] In: Cifuentes A, ed. ''Comprehensive Foodomics.'' Elsevier; 2020:407–416.</ref> Notable among these are [[lipid transfer protein]]s (LTP) and [[protein Z]], which are the two major proteins in finished beer.
The mature [[barley]] grain contains a spectrum of proteins that differ in function, location, structure, and other physical and chemical characteristics. The level of protein is a critical aspect of the quality of [[malt]] and [[beer]], and it is influenced by [[grain]] variety, soil conditions, crop rotation, fertilization, and weather conditions.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=picariello/><ref name=mahalingam/> Generally, the protein content in barley grain represents approximately 8–16% of its total mass.<ref name=silva>Silva F, Nogueira LC, Goncalves C, Ferreira AA, Ferreira IMPLVO, Teixeira N. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814607006085 Electrophoretic and HPLC methods for comparative study of the protein fractions of malts, worts and beers produced from Scarlett and Prestige barley (''Hordeum vulgare'' L.) varieties.] ''Food Chem.'' 2008;106(2):820–829.</ref><ref name=mahalingam>Mahalingam R. [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-016-3408-5 Shotgun proteomics of the barley seed proteome.] ''BMC Genomics.'' 2017;18(44).</ref> Brewers prefer lower protein levels as long as there is plenty of soluble nitrogen for good yeast nutrition and beer foam potential.<ref name=crit>Bamforth CW, Fox GP. [https://www.brewingscience.de/index.php?tpl=table_of_contents&year=2020&edition=0009%2F0010&article=92781 Critical aspects of starch in brewing.] ''BrewingScience.'' 2020;73(9/10):126–139.</ref> This is because excessive protein content decreases the relative amount of [[carbohydrates]] (mainly [[starch]]) and also has other negative influences on the [[brewing]] process.<ref name=yu/> The barley used for [[malting]] should generally fall at the lower end of this range, with about 9–11% protein.<ref name=fix/><ref>Yu W, Tao K, Gidley MJ, Fox GP, Gilbert RG. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328971139_Molecular_brewing_Molecular_structural_effects_involved_in_barley_malting_and_mashing Molecular brewing: Molecular structural effects involved in barley malting and mashing.] ''Carbohydr Polym.'' 2019;206:583–592.</ref> Six-row barley tends to have more protein content and thus less starch than two-row.<ref name=mahalingam/> Hordeins (storage proteins) are the most abundant proteins found in a barley grain, and they form a matrix around the [[starch]] granules, increasing grain hardness.<ref name=celus>Celus I, Brijs K, Delcour JA. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0733521006000762 The effects of malting and mashing on barley protein extractability.] ''J Cereal Sci.'' 2006;44(2):203–211.</ref><ref name=iimure/> These storage proteins are created specifically to be broken down and used as a source of amino acids for building other proteins during seed germination, facilitating the plant's growth. A large variety of other proteins are present in barley, with over a thousand unique proteins identified.<ref name=kerr>Kerr ED, Fox GP, Schulz BL. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081005965228692 Grass to glass: Better beer through proteomics.] In: Cifuentes A, ed. ''Comprehensive Foodomics.'' Elsevier; 2020:407–416.</ref> Notable among these are [[lipid transfer protein]]s (LTP) and [[protein Z]], which are the two major proteins in finished beer.


Although there are some differences in protein structure, the overall protein profile of beers produced from other cereal grains used for brewing tends to be similar, including [[wheat]] and [[oats]].<ref name=picariello/><ref name=klose>Klose C, Thiele F, Arendt EK. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2010-0312-01 Changes in the protein profile of oats and barley during brewing and fermentation.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2010;68(2):119–124.</ref>
Although there are some differences in protein structure, the overall protein profile of beers produced from other cereal grains used for brewing tends to be similar, including [[wheat]] and [[oats]].<ref name=picariello/><ref name=klose>Klose C, Thiele F, Arendt EK. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2010-0312-01 Changes in the protein profile of oats and barley during brewing and fermentation.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2010;68(2):119–124.</ref>
Line 22: Line 22:
FYI, some references report the malt protein content as the nitrogen content of a material multiplied by 6.25 (or some other factor). This is incorrect and misleading, since many substances besides proteins contain nitrogen.<ref name=bsp/>
FYI, some references report the malt protein content as the nitrogen content of a material multiplied by 6.25 (or some other factor). This is incorrect and misleading, since many substances besides proteins contain nitrogen.<ref name=bsp/>


Barley naturally contains proteins that inhibit fungal (e.g. yeast) growth, such as LTP, barwin, and Thaumatin-like protein (active only in unmalted grain).<ref name=iimure/> Fortunately, these proteins do not survive the mashing process and therefore do not inhibit the fermentation.<ref name=stanislava/>
Interestingly, barley naturally contains proteins that inhibit fungal (e.g. yeast) growth, such as barwin and Thaumatin-like protein (active only in unmalted grain).<ref name=iimure/> These proteins can pass to the final beer, although the yeast inhibition by these proteins is obviously not a significant concern for brewers.


===Adjuncts===
===Adjuncts===
Line 29: Line 29:
==Proteins in the mash==
==Proteins in the mash==
Complex protein biochemistry occurs during the mash.<ref name=kerr/> The activity of enzymes is the prime example, and they have numerous important effects (see [[Enzymes]]). Beyond this, certain proteins combine with other substances such as sugars or [[phenolic compounds|polyphenols]], storage proteins are partly degraded and/or solubilized and transferred into the produced wort, and some proteins can help buffer against [[oxidation]].<ref name=steiner/> Negative effects on the brewing process can also occur as a result of protein chemistry. The protein matrix (hordeins) of poorly-modified [[malt]] may inhibit [[saccharification|starch degradation]] during mashing by physically preventing access by α-amylase, which can potentially reduce the amount of [[extract]] obtained.<ref name=yu/> Protein aggregation may reduce or prevent wort flow during [[lautering]] or recirculation (i.e. a "[[stuck mash]]") by forming a gel.<ref name=slack>Slack PT, Baxter ED, Wainwright T. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1979.tb06837.x Inhibition by hordein of starch degradation.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 1979;85(2):112–114.</ref> Despite all this activity, much of the protein is insoluble and therefore discarded with the [[spent grains]]. The intact proteins present in the wort at the end of mashing (at least 20 different types) are generally those that are resistant to degradation by malt proteinases.<ref name=iimure/> Proteins are not significantly modified via [[glycoproteins|glycation]] during the mashing process. However, mashing at higher temperature increases the level of [[glycoproteins]], perhaps due to greater extraction.<ref name=jegou/>
Complex protein biochemistry occurs during the mash.<ref name=kerr/> The activity of enzymes is the prime example, and they have numerous important effects (see [[Enzymes]]). Beyond this, certain proteins combine with other substances such as sugars or [[phenolic compounds|polyphenols]], storage proteins are partly degraded and/or solubilized and transferred into the produced wort, and some proteins can help buffer against [[oxidation]].<ref name=steiner/> Negative effects on the brewing process can also occur as a result of protein chemistry. The protein matrix (hordeins) of poorly-modified [[malt]] may inhibit [[saccharification|starch degradation]] during mashing by physically preventing access by α-amylase, which can potentially reduce the amount of [[extract]] obtained.<ref name=yu/> Protein aggregation may reduce or prevent wort flow during [[lautering]] or recirculation (i.e. a "[[stuck mash]]") by forming a gel.<ref name=slack>Slack PT, Baxter ED, Wainwright T. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1979.tb06837.x Inhibition by hordein of starch degradation.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 1979;85(2):112–114.</ref> Despite all this activity, much of the protein is insoluble and therefore discarded with the [[spent grains]]. The intact proteins present in the wort at the end of mashing (at least 20 different types) are generally those that are resistant to degradation by malt proteinases.<ref name=iimure/> Proteins are not significantly modified via [[glycoproteins|glycation]] during the mashing process. However, mashing at higher temperature increases the level of [[glycoproteins]], perhaps due to greater extraction.<ref name=jegou/>
The precipitation of nitrogenous compounds at high temperatures removes sequestering agents from the wort leading to a significant loss of minerals.<ref name=monmay>Montanari L, Mayer H, Marconi O, Fantozzi P. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780123738912000341 Chapter 34: Minerals in beer.] In: Preedy VR, ed. [[Library|''Beer in Health and Disease Prevention.'']] Academic Press; 2009:359–365.</ref>


===Oxidation===
===Oxidation===
Oxygen introduced into the mash causes the aggregation of "gel-proteins" (certain types of hordeins) as well as larger polypeptides.<ref name=adb/><ref name=poyri>Pöyri S, Mikola M, Sontag-Strohm T, Kaukovirta-Norja A, Home S. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2002.tb00550.x The formation and hydrolysis of barley malt gel-protein under different mashing conditions.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2002;108(2):261–267.</ref><ref name=celus/><ref name=karhan/><ref name=jinspe>Jin YL, Speers RA, Paulson AT, Stewart RJ. [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Speers/publication/285959138_Effects_of_b-Glucans_Shearing_and_Environmental_Factors_on_Wort_Filtration_Performance/links/587e215408ae4445c06f6ff2/Effects-of-b-Glucans-Shearing-and-Environmental-Factors-on-Wort-Filtration-Performance.pdf Effects of β-glucans, shearing, and environmental factors on wort filtration performance.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2004;62(4):155–162.</ref> They become insoluble at higher mash temperatures and settle as a doughy layer on top of the spent grains in a traditional lauter tun. This layer is often called the teig or ''Oberteig'' (which means "upper dough" in German), and it can prevent clarification, and slow down or stop lautering and/or recirculation.<ref name=stephenson>Stephenson WH, Biawa JP, Miracle RE, Bamforth CW. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2003.tb00168.x Laboratory-scale studies of the impact of oxygen on mashing.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2003;109(3):273–283.</ref><ref>Lewis MJ, Young TW. ''Brewing.'' Springer; 2001:216.</ref> Small starch granules, β-glucans, and pentosans, which in turn are linked to proteins, also take part in the formation of complexes, which lead to increased dough formation. They can also hinder the release of starch granules and thus the effect of the amylases. The formation of gel-protein is minimal at low temperature (e.g. 118°F, 48°C) possibly due to the action of proteases, but during and after the saccharification rests (e.g. 145°F, 63°C), the amount of gel-protein rises rapidly when the mash is oxidized. The ''Oberteig'' tends to become especially prominent if the mash is recirculated, or it can also form during vorlauf.
Oxygen introduced into the mash causes the formation of larger polypeptide aggregates (linked via disulfide bridges, see below), which become insoluble at higher mash temperatures and which settle as a doughy layer on top of the spent grains in a traditional lauter tun.<ref name=adb/><ref name=poyri>Pöyri S, Mikola M, Sontag-Strohm T, Kaukovirta-Norja A, Home S. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2002.tb00550.x The formation and hydrolysis of barley malt gel-protein under different mashing conditions.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2002;108(2):261–267.</ref><ref name=celus/> This layer is often called the ''Oberteig'' (which means "upper dough" in German), and it can prevent clarification, and slow down or stop lautering and/or recirculation. Similar behavior is seen by the so-called "gel proteins", which are certain types of hordeins dissolved during malting. During mashing, they too can result in groups of a protein/polypeptide/lipid aggregates resulting from oxidation. Small starch granules, β-glucans, and pentosans, which in turn are linked to proteins, also take part in the formation of complexes, which lead to increased dough formation. They can also hinder the release of starch granules and thus the effect of the amylases. The formation of gel-protein is minimal at low temperature (e.g. 118°F, 48°C) possibly due to the action of proteases, but during and after the saccharification rests (e.g. 145°F, 63°C), the amount of gel-protein rises rapidly when the mash is oxidized. The ''Oberteig'' tends to become especially prominent if the mash is recirculated, or it can also form during vorlauf.


All of these negative effects can be prevented by limiting oxygen in the mash, especially when oxygen-scavengers are also used.<ref name=poyri/><ref name=karhan/><ref name=mullerr/> In other words, [[low oxygen brewing]] improves lautering and recirculation speed due to the prevention of ''Oberteig'' and gel protein aggregate formation. However, low-oxygen mashing actually encourages effective coagulation of larger proteins such that they do not contribute to haze.<ref name=derouck>De Rouck G, Jaskula-Goiris B, De Causmaecker B, et al. [https://www.brewingscience.de/index.php?tpl=table_of_contents&year=2013&edition=0001%252F0002&article=82374 The impact of wort production on the flavour quality and stability of pale lager beer.] ''BrewingScience.'' 2013;66(1/2):1–11.</ref><ref name=karhan/> They are retained in the spent grains after lautering, but not in a form that reduces wort flow.
All of these negative effects can be prevented by limiting oxygen in the mash, especially when oxygen-scavengers are also used.<ref name=poyri/> In other words, [[low oxygen brewing]] improves lautering and recirculation speed due to the prevention of ''Oberteig'' and gel protein aggregate formation. However, low-oxygen mashing actually encourages effective coagulation of larger proteins such that they do not contribute to haze.<ref name=derouck>De Rouck G, Jaskula-Goiris B, De Causmaecker B, et al. [https://www.brewingscience.de/index.php?tpl=table_of_contents&year=2013&edition=0001%252F0002&article=82374 The impact of wort production on the flavour quality and stability of pale lager beer.] ''BrewingScience.'' 2013;66(1/2):1–11.</ref> They are retained in the spent grains after lautering, but not in a form that reduces wort flow.


Many proteins contain "thiol" groups, each made up of a sulfur and hydrogen (–SH) branch from an amino acid (especially cysteine) in the protein or polypeptide. These thiol groups can bond to each other, forming a "disulfide bridge" by linking the sulfur atoms together, removing the hydrogen atoms.<ref name=karhan/> This bonding occurs very rapidly under oxidative conditions; oxygen in the mash oxidizes the free thiols, creating links between molecules, thereby forming aggregates.<ref name=lund/><ref name=mullerr/><ref name=karhan>Karabín M, Hanko V, Nešpor J, Jelínek L, Dostálek P. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jib.502 Hop tannin extract: a promising tool for acceleration of lautering.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2018;124(4):374–380.</ref> Certain enzymes in grain catalyze the oxidation of thiols, and these may include sulphydryl oxidase (thiol oxidase), glutathione oxidase, glutathione peroxidase and phospholipid-hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (but neither peroxidases nor lipoxygenases).<ref name=stephenson>Stephenson WH, Biawa JP, Miracle RE, Bamforth CW. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2003.tb00168.x Laboratory-scale studies of the impact of oxygen on mashing.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2003;109(3):273–283.</ref><ref name=kanbam>Kanauchi M, Bamforth CW. [https://www.themodernbrewhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/BrewingScience_bamforth_82-84.pdf A Challenge in the study of flavour instability.] ''BrewingScience - Monatsschrift Brauwiss.'' 2018;71(Sept/Oct):82–84.</ref> It's interesting that thiol oxidation is actually used in many scientific studies as a measure of wort oxidation, which is of particular interest to many breweries due to its correlation with gel formation.<ref name=celus/> Disulfide bonds may be broken by reducing (oxygen-scavenging) compounds such as [[sulfite]], resulting in the regeneration of the original protein thiol groups. Regenerated thiol groups can participate in new reaction cycles with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and, taken as a whole, act as catalysts for the removal of ROS by sulfite.<ref name=lundmn>Lund MN, Andersen ML. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0620-01 Detection of Thiol Groups in Beer and Their Correlation with Oxidative Stability.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2011;69(3):163–169.</ref> This antioxidant mechanism includes [[lipid transfer protein]] 1 (LTP1) as an important thiol-containing protein. See [[Protein#Influence on flavor stability|Influence on flavor stability]] below, and [[Oxidation]] for more information.
To delve further into the chemistry, many proteins contain "thiol" groups, each made up of a sulfur and hydrogen (–SH) branch from an amino acid (especially cysteine) in the protein or polypeptide. These thiol groups can bond to each other, forming a "disulfide bridge" by linking the sulfur atoms together, removing the hydrogen atoms. This bonding occurs very rapidly under oxidative conditions; oxygen in the mash oxidizes the free thiols, creating links between molecules, thereby forming aggregates.<ref name=lund/> Certain enzymes in grain catalyze the oxidation of thiols, and these may include sulphydryl oxidase, glutathione oxidase, glutathione peroxidase and phospholipid-hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (but neither peroxidases nor lipoxygenases).<ref name=stephenson>Stephenson WH, Biawa JP, Miracle RE, Bamforth CW. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2003.tb00168.x Laboratory-scale studies of the impact of oxygen on mashing.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2003;109(3):273–283.</ref> It's interesting that thiol oxidation is actually used in many scientific studies as a measure of wort oxidation, which is of particular interest to many breweries due to its correlation with gel formation.<ref name=celus/> Disulfide bonds may be broken by reducing (oxygen-scavenging) compounds such as [[sulfite]], resulting in the regeneration of the original protein thiol groups. Regenerated thiol groups can participate in new reaction cycles with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and, taken as a whole, act as catalysts for the removal of ROS by sulfite.<ref name=lundmn>Lund MN, Andersen ML. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0620-01 Detection of Thiol Groups in Beer and Their Correlation with Oxidative Stability.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2011;69(3):163–169.</ref> This antioxidant mechanism includes [[lipid transfer protein]] 1 (LTP1) as an important thiol-containing protein. See [[Protein#Influence on flavor stability|Influence on flavor stability]] below, and [[Oxidation]] for more information.


===Protein degradation===
===Protein degradation===
Line 48: Line 46:
A wide variety of protease [[enzymes]] are involved in the protein degradation process, and besides amylases, they are the key degradation enzymes.<ref name=steiner/> Grain proteins are initially solubilized by '''endo'''proteases that break bonds in the middle of protein chains (endo- means inner), similar to the action of α-amylase on starch.<ref name=lund/><ref name=osman/><ref name=benesova/> Then they are further degraded by '''exo'''proteases that break off single amino acids from the ends of polypeptides (exo- means outer), similar to the action of β-amylase on starch. Besides degrading proteins, many of these enzymes also have other activities — ester modification, coagulation, and/or transpeptidase activity.<ref name=benesova>Benešová K, Běláková S, Mikulíková R, Svoboda Z. [http://kvasnyprumysl.eu/index.php/kp/article/download/95/74 Activity of proteolytic enzymes during malting and brewing.] ''Kvasný Prům.'' 2017;63(1):2–7.</ref> Proteolytic enzyme activity appears to be fairly consistent across widely different malt varieties, regardless of the breed or growing conditions.<ref name=osman/><ref name=jonesbl>Jones BL. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S073352100500055X Endoproteases of barley and malt.] ''J Cereal Sci.'' 2005;42(2):139–156.</ref> Enzyme thermostability also appears consistent across barley types.<ref name=jones/>
A wide variety of protease [[enzymes]] are involved in the protein degradation process, and besides amylases, they are the key degradation enzymes.<ref name=steiner/> Grain proteins are initially solubilized by '''endo'''proteases that break bonds in the middle of protein chains (endo- means inner), similar to the action of α-amylase on starch.<ref name=lund/><ref name=osman/><ref name=benesova/> Then they are further degraded by '''exo'''proteases that break off single amino acids from the ends of polypeptides (exo- means outer), similar to the action of β-amylase on starch. Besides degrading proteins, many of these enzymes also have other activities — ester modification, coagulation, and/or transpeptidase activity.<ref name=benesova>Benešová K, Běláková S, Mikulíková R, Svoboda Z. [http://kvasnyprumysl.eu/index.php/kp/article/download/95/74 Activity of proteolytic enzymes during malting and brewing.] ''Kvasný Prům.'' 2017;63(1):2–7.</ref> Proteolytic enzyme activity appears to be fairly consistent across widely different malt varieties, regardless of the breed or growing conditions.<ref name=osman/><ref name=jonesbl>Jones BL. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S073352100500055X Endoproteases of barley and malt.] ''J Cereal Sci.'' 2005;42(2):139–156.</ref> Enzyme thermostability also appears consistent across barley types.<ref name=jones/>


Malt '''endo'''proteases are complex and diverse, and are created in multiple forms during the germination of barley. They exhibit different optimal activity levels for pH, reaction temperature, and thermostability.<ref name=osman/> Barley malt contains over 40 endoproteinases, grouped into four classes: cysteine proteases, metalloproteases, aspartic proteases, and serine proteases.<ref name=zhang/><ref name=jones>Jones BL, Marinac L. [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf0109672 The effect of mashing on malt endoproteolytic activities.] ''J Agric Food Chem.'' 2002;50(4):858–864.</ref> The cysteine- and metalloproteinases play large roles in solubilizing the barley storage proteins, while aspartic proteinases play a smaller role and serine proteinases apparently have little to no role.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=jonesbudde/><ref name=mashing/>
Malt '''endo'''proteases are complex and diverse, and are created in multiple forms during the germination of barley. They exhibit different optimal activity levels for pH, reaction temperature, and thermostability.<ref name=osman/> Barley malt contains over 40 endoproteinases, grouped into four classes: cysteine proteases, metalloproteases, aspartic proteases, and serine proteases.<ref name=zhang/><ref name=jones>Jones BL, Marinac L. [https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf0109672 The effect of mashing on malt endoproteolytic activities.] ''J Agric Food Chem.'' 2002;50(4):858–864.</ref> The aspartic-, cysteine- and metalloproteinases likely play roles in solubilizing the storage proteins of barley and malt, whereas the serine proteinases apparently do not.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=jonesbudde/>


Two types of '''exo'''proteases exist, aminopeptidases and carboxypeptidases, which work from opposite ends of the amino acid chains. Five carboxypeptidases are present in barley malt.<ref name=steiner/> Of all proteolytic malt enzymes, these carboxypeptidases are the most thermally resistant and also their optimal pH (4.8–5.6) is close to that of mashes. As a result, about 80% of the released amino acids are liberated during mashing by these enzymes.<ref name=benesova/><ref name=jonesbudde/> In contrast, the aminopeptidases (of which there are at least six forms)<ref>Strelec I, Vukelic B, Vitale L. [https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/62486 Aminopeptidases of germinated and non-germinated barley.] ''Food Technol Biotechnol.'' 2009;47(3):296–303.</ref> and also the dipeptidases (which cleaves dipeptides to amino acids) present in malt are generally inactive and have no effect on the level of amino acids in wort.<ref name=benesova/>
Two types of '''exo'''proteases exist, aminopeptidases and carboxypeptidases, which work from opposite ends of the amino acid chains. Five carboxypeptidases are present in barley malt.<ref name=steiner/> Of all proteolytic malt enzymes, these carboxypeptidases are the most thermally resistant and also their optimal pH (4.8–5.6) is close to that of mashes. As a result, about 80% of the released amino acids are liberated during mashing by these enzymes.<ref name=benesova/><ref name=jonesbudde/> In contrast, the aminopeptidases (of which there are at least six forms)<ref>Strelec I, Vukelic B, Vitale L. [https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/62486 Aminopeptidases of germinated and non-germinated barley.] ''Food Technol Biotechnol.'' 2009;47(3):296–303.</ref> and also the dipeptidases (which cleaves dipeptides to amino acids) present in malt are generally inactive and have no effect on the level of amino acids in wort.<ref name=benesova/>


Excessive protein degradation is unnecessary and undesirable.<ref name=kunze/> Too much proteolysis may cause the development of undesirable flavors and color, reduced foam, and a thinner mouth feel.<ref name=osman/><ref name=lund/> Brewers can manipulate the amount of protein degradation mainly through control of the mash temperature and duration. At mash temperatures around 113–131°F (45–55°C), proteins are most thoroughly degraded, producing small protein fragments and amino acids. A rest in this temperature range (i.e. a "protein rest") should be avoided ''except'' when using poorly-modified malts.<ref name=kunze/> At higher mash temperatures such as 140–158°F (60–70°C), mostly larger protein fragments are formed, which are responsible for [[foam]] stability and mouth feel. Due to their heat-sensitivity, proteinases generally begin to inactivate at temperatures above 140°F (60°C). Above 158°F (70°C), they are inactivated more quickly, although they retain activity for about 15–20 minutes or possibly longer.<ref name=jones/><ref name=klose/><ref name=poyri/> The Hoch-Kurz [[mashing]] process can be implemented in order to restrict the activity of the endopeptidases and thus increase the percentage of larger peptides while retaining sufficient amino acid formation through the activity of the more thermostable carboxypeptidases.<ref name=sacher/><ref name=derouck/><ref name=cven>Cvengroschová M, Šepel'ová G, Šmogrovičová D. [https://www.themodernbrewhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/128-131.pdf Effect of mashing-in temperature on free amino nitrogen concentration and foam stability of beer.] ''Monatsschrift Brauwiss.'' 2003;56(7/8):128–131.</ref> The proteases are stable enough that even with these relatively high mashing temperatures, the total soluble protein level cannot drop below a value that was already predetermined by the malt quality.<ref name=adb/> Proteolysis doesn't fully stop until around 176°F (80°C), well above mash temperature.
Excessive protein degradation is unnecessary and undesirable.<ref name=kunze/> Too much proteolysis may cause the development of undesirable flavors and color, reduced foam, and a thinner mouth feel.<ref name=osman/><ref name=lund/> Brewers can manipulate the amount of protein degradation mainly through control of the mash temperature and duration. At mash temperatures around 113–131°F (45–55°C), proteins are most thoroughly degraded, producing small protein fragments and amino acids. A rest in this temperature range (i.e. a "protein rest") should be avoided ''except'' when using poorly-modified malts.<ref name=kunze/> At higher mash temperatures such as 140–158°F (60–70°C), mostly larger protein fragments are formed, which are responsible for [[foam]] stability and mouth feel. Due to their heat-sensitivity, proteinases generally begin to inactivate at temperatures above 140°F (60°C). Above 158°F (70°C), they are inactivated more quickly, although they retain activity for about 15–20 minutes or possibly longer.<ref name=jones/><ref name=klose/><ref name=poyri/> The Hoch-Kurz [[mashing]] process can be implemented in order to restrict the activity of the endopeptidases and thus increase the percentage of larger peptides while retaining sufficient amino acid formation through the activity of the more thermostable carboxypeptidases.<ref name=sacher/><ref name=derouck/> The proteases are stable enough that even with these relatively high mashing temperatures, the total soluble protein level cannot drop below a value that was already predetermined by the malt quality.<ref name=adb/> Proteolysis doesn't fully stop until around 176°F (80°C), well above mash temperature.


To a lesser extent, [[brewing pH|mash pH]], grist to liquor ratio, and other factors can influence the activity of proteases and solubility of polypeptides.<ref name=picariello/> The activity of cysteine proteases (and therefore protein degradation) is inhibited by mash oxidation and stimulated by reducing agents.<ref name=benesova/><ref name=poyri/><ref name=sacher>Sacher B, Becker T, Narziss L. [http://www.themodernbrewhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pkjdf.pdf Some reflections on mashing – Part 1.] ''Brauwelt International.'' 2016;5:309-311.</ref><ref name=jonesbl>Jones BL. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S073352100500055X Endoproteases of barley and malt.] ''J Cereal Sci.'' 2005;42(2):139–156.</ref> Metalloproteases are inhibited by chelators (especially those with affinity for [[zinc]]).<ref name=benesova/><ref>Rizvi SMH, Beattie A, Rossnagel B, Scoles G. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215493909_Thermostability_of_Barley_Malt_Proteases_in_Western_Canadian_Two-Row_Malting_Barley Thermostability of barley malt proteases in western Canadian two-row malting barley] ''Cereal Chem.'' 2011;88(6):609–613</ref> Protease activity generally increases as the mash pH approaches 5.0 (see [[Brewing pH]]).<ref name=adb/> Protein degradation is greater in thicker mashes because enzyme activity is protected from thermal inactivation due to a protective colloid effect.<ref name=adb/> Finer grist appears to release amino acids into the wort more quickly, but ultimately it does not affect the level of protein degradation.<ref name=kuhbeck>Kühbeck F, Dickel T, Krottenthaler M, et al.  
To a lesser extent, [[brewing pH|mash pH]], grist to liquor ratio, and other factors can influence the activity of proteases and solubility of polypeptides.<ref name=picariello/> The activity of cysteine proteases (and therefore protein degradation) is inhibited by mash oxidation and stimulated by reducing agents.<ref name=benesova/><ref name=poyri/><ref name=sacher>Sacher B, Becker T, Narziss L. [http://www.lowoxygenbrewing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pkjdf.pdf Some reflections on mashing – Part 1.] ''Brauwelt International.'' 2016;5:309-311.</ref><ref name=jonesbl>Jones BL. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S073352100500055X Endoproteases of barley and malt.] ''J Cereal Sci.'' 2005;42(2):139–156.</ref> Metalloproteases are inhibited by chelators (especially those with affinity for [[zinc]]).<ref name=benesova/><ref>Rizvi SMH, Beattie A, Rossnagel B, Scoles G. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215493909_Thermostability_of_Barley_Malt_Proteases_in_Western_Canadian_Two-Row_Malting_Barley Thermostability of barley malt proteases in western Canadian two-row malting barley] ''Cereal Chem.'' 2011;88(6):609–613</ref> Protease activity generally increases as the mash pH approaches 5.0 (see [[Brewing pH]]).<ref name=adb/> Protein degradation is greater in thicker mashes because enzyme activity is protected from thermal inactivation due to a protective colloid effect.<ref name=adb/> Finer grist appears to release amino acids into the wort more quickly, but ultimately it does not affect the level of protein degradation.<ref name=kuhbeck>Kühbeck F, Dickel T, Krottenthaler M, et al.  
[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2005.tb00690.x Effects of mashing parameters on mash β-glucan, FAN and soluble extract levels.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2005;111(3):316–327.</ref>
[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2005.tb00690.x Effects of mashing parameters on mash β-glucan, FAN and soluble extract levels.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 2005;111(3):316–327.</ref>


Line 76: Line 74:


===Wort nitrogen levels===
===Wort nitrogen levels===
Nitrogen is present in many forms in wort. All-malt wort contains about 650–1000 mg/L nitrogen, of which about 20% is proteins, 30–40% is polypeptides, 30–40% is free [[amino acids]], and 10% is nucleotides and other nitrogenous compounds.<ref name=lei>Lei H, Zheng L, Wang C, Zhao H, Zhao M. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160512006150 Effects of worts treated with proteases on the assimilation of free amino acids and fermentation performance of lager yeast.] ''Int J Food Microbiol.'' 2013;161(2):76–83.</ref> See [[Free amino nitrogen]] for more information regarding amino acid content of wort.
Nitrogen is present in many forms in wort. All-malt wort contains about 650–1000 mg/L nitrogen, of which about 20% is proteins, 30–40% is polypeptides, 30–40% is free amino acids, and 10% is nucleotides and other nitrogenous compounds.<ref name=lei>Lei H, Zheng L, Wang C, Zhao H, Zhao M. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160512006150 Effects of worts treated with proteases on the assimilation of free amino acids and fermentation performance of lager yeast.] ''Int J Food Microbiol.'' 2013;161(2):76–83.</ref>
 
Free amino nitrogen (FAN) is a measure of the low molecular weight substances, mainly amino acids, which are needed to support yeast growth and metabolism.<ref name=bsp>Briggs DE, Boulton CA, Brookes PA, Stevens R. [[Library|''Brewing Science and Practice.'']] Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC; 2004.</ref> FAN has long been regarded as a predictor of healthy yeast growth, viability, vitality, fermentation efficiency, and beer quality and stability.<ref name=lekkas>Lekkas C, Hill AE, Stewart GG. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2014-0113-01 Extraction of FAN from malting barley during malting and mashing.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2014;72(1):6–11.</ref> This is because FAN is used to provide not only nitrogen to the yeast cells for growth but also the wort nitrogen content or its metabolic products which affect beer flavor compounds and overall stability. The desired concentration of 200–250 mg/L free amino acids is typically available even without the proteolytic activity during mashing.<ref name=kuhbeck/> Around 88% of the total yeast utilizable nitrogen is produced during malting and 12% is produced during mashing (on average, with some variation between malts). This means that brewers producing all-malt wort generally don't need to worry about supplementing yeast nutrition as long as good practices are used for brewing and pitching. The FAN level of wort is fairly consistent (when produced within the standard pH range, which is optimal for FAN production) regardless of whether a protein rest is performed.<ref>De Rouck G, Jaskula B, De Causmaecker B, et al. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2013-0113-01 The influence of very thick and fast mashing conditions on wort composition.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2013;71(1):1–14.</ref><ref name=kuhbeck/><ref name=schwarz>Schwarz KJ, Boitz LI, Methner FJ. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2012-1011-02 Release of phenolic acids and amino acids during mashing dependent on temperature, pH, time, and raw materials.] ''J Am Soc Brew Chem.'' 2012;70(4):290–295.</ref>
 
The amount of yeast-assimilable nitrogen (YAN; the amount of usable amino acids and ammonia in the wort) can be approximately measured by using a formal titration, although it's generally not a worthwhile practice for brewers.<ref name=adb/><ref name=bsp/> See [[YAN testing]].


==Proteins in the boil==
==Proteins in the boil==
Line 116: Line 118:
This section is in progress.
This section is in progress.


As described above, grain proteins are solubilized during the mash.  Much of this protein is then removed during the mash, the boil, and during fermentation. Yet, approximately one-third of the protein content is resistant to degradation and precipitation and hence passes through the processing steps, intact or somewhat modified, to the final beer.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=jin/><ref name=lund/><ref name=han>Han Y, Wang J, Li Y, Hang Y, Yin X, Li Q. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814615005993 Circular dichroism and infrared spectroscopic characterization of secondary structure components of protein Z during mashing and boiling processes.] ''Food Chem.'' 2015;188:201–209.</ref> A total of ~1900 unique proteins have been identified in beer.<ref name=kerr/> Almost all beer protein is derived from barley, with yeast proteins as minor constituents.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=wu/><ref name=picariello/> These proteins are well-known to influence beer characteristics such as foam, haze, color, flavor, flavor stability, and mouthfeel of beer.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=lund/><ref>Langstaff SA, Lewis MJ. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1993.tb01143.x The mouthfeel of beer—a review.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 1993;99(1):31–37.</ref> The amount of protein in beer is expected to vary enormously according to the malt used and the brewing process employed. However, the main protein components are similar in practically all beer produced.<ref name=picariello/> The "average" beer should contain somewhere in the neighborhood of 0.5–1 g/L proteins.<ref name=didier>Didier M, Bénédicte B. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123738912000249 Soluble proteins of beer.] In: Preedy VR, ed. ''Beer in Health and Disease Prevention.'' Academic Press; 2009:265–271.</ref><ref name=stanislava>Stanislava G. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2007.tb00291.x Barley grain non-specific lipid-transfer proteins (ns-LTPs) in beer production and quality]. ''J Inst Brew''. 2007;113(3):310–324.</ref>
As described above, grain proteins are solubilized during the mash.  Much of this protein is then removed during the mash, the boil, and during fermentation. Yet, approximately one-third of the protein content is resistant to degradation and precipitation and hence passes through the processing steps, intact or somewhat modified, to the final beer.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=jin/><ref name=lund/><ref name=han>Han Y, Wang J, Li Y, Hang Y, Yin X, Li Q. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814615005993 Circular dichroism and infrared spectroscopic characterization of secondary structure components of protein Z during mashing and boiling processes.] ''Food Chem.'' 2015;188:201–209.</ref> A total of ~1900 unique proteins have been identified in beer.<ref name=kerr/> Almost all beer protein is derived from barley, with yeast proteins as minor constituents.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=wu/><ref name=picariello/> These proteins are well-known to influence beer characteristics such as foam, haze, color, flavor, flavor stability, and mouthfeel of beer.<ref name=steiner/><ref name=lund/><ref>Langstaff SA, Lewis MJ. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1993.tb01143.x The mouthfeel of beer—a review.] ''J Inst Brew.'' 1993;99(1):31–37.</ref> The amount of protein in beer is expected to vary enormously according to the malt used and the brewing process employed. However, the main protein components are similar in practically all beer produced.<ref name=picariello/> The "average" beer should contain somewhere in the neighborhood of 0.5–1 g/L proteins.<ref name=didier>Didier M, Bénédicte B. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123738912000249 Soluble proteins of beer.] In: Preedy VR, ed. ''Beer in Health and Disease Prevention.'' Academic Press; 2009:265–271.</ref>  


Three major protein components are present in beer:<ref name=jin/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=wu/>
Three major protein components are present in beer:<ref name=jin/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=wu/>
# [[Protein Z]] - a polypeptide with a molecular mass of 40 kDa. It's role is unclear but it may be involved with beer foam formation and/or stability, or possibly haze.<ref name=jin/><ref name=silva/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=han/> Protein Z is a member of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) family.<ref name=wu/>
# [[Protein Z]] - a polypeptide with a molecular mass of 40 kDa. It's role is unclear but it may be involved with beer foam formation and/or stability, or possibly haze.<ref name=jin/><ref name=silva/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=han/> Protein Z is a member of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) family.<ref name=wu/>
# [[Lipid transfer protein]] 1 (LTP1) - a 9.7 kDa polypeptide, which is responsible for foam formation and serves as an antioxidant.<ref name=jin/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=han/><ref name=wu/>
# [[Lipid transfer protein]] 1 (LTP1) - a 9.7 kDa polypeptide, which is responsible for foam stability and serves as an antioxidant.<ref name=jin/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=han/><ref name=wu/>
# A group of proline-rich hordein-derived polypeptides (with sizes ranging from 10 kDa to 30 kDa) that are involved in haze formation and possibly promote foam.<ref name=jin/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=iimure/><ref name=kerr/>
# A group of proline-rich hordein-derived polypeptides (with sizes ranging from 10 kDa to 30 kDa) that are involved in haze formation and possibly promote foam.<ref name=jin/><ref name=steiner/><ref name=iimure/><ref name=kerr/>


While the main focus of research has been on foam or haze, some beer proteins appear to also have a beneficial contribution to mouthfeel, flavor, texture, body, color, and nutritional value.<ref name=silva/>
While the main focus of research has been on foam or haze, some beer proteins appear to have no function in beer except their contribution to mouthfeel, flavor, texture, body, color, and nutritional value.<ref name=silva/> In addition, some barley malt proteins are suggested to be allergens, and fungal contamination can modify LTP1 to result in beer gushing (over foaming at the bottle opening).<ref name=iimure>Iimure T, Nankaku N, Kihara M, Yamada S, Sato K. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996911006144 Proteome analysis of the wort boiling process.] ''Food Res Int.'' 2012;45(1):262–271.</ref>


Proteins can have negative effects as well. Some barley malt proteins are suggested to be allergens, and fungal contamination can modify LTP1 to result in beer gushing (over foaming at the bottle opening).<ref name=iimure>Iimure T, Nankaku N, Kihara M, Yamada S, Sato K. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996911006144 Proteome analysis of the wort boiling process.] ''Food Res Int.'' 2012;45(1):262–271.</ref> Proteins of beer can elicit IgE-mediated allergic reactions, although the prevalence of allergy to beer is relatively low.<ref name=picariello>Picariello G, Mamone G, Nitride C, Ferranti P. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128040072000230 Proteomic analysis of beer.] In: Colgrave ML, ed. ''Proteomics in Food Science.'' 2017:383–403.</ref> Also, the (poly)peptides derived from hordein (AKA gluten) can trigger an autoimmune reaction in subjects suffering from celiac disease. Intact hordeins occur at low concentrations in beer because of their scarce solubility in the low-alcohol solutions. See [[Health and safety]].
Proteins of beer can elicit IgE-mediated allergic reactions, although the prevalence of allergy to beer is relatively low.<ref name=picariello>Picariello G, Mamone G, Nitride C, Ferranti P. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128040072000230 Proteomic analysis of beer.] In: Colgrave ML, ed. ''Proteomics in Food Science.'' 2017:383–403.</ref> On the other hand, the (poly)peptides derived from hordein (AKA gluten) can trigger an autoimmune reaction in subjects suffering from celiac disease. Intact hordeins occur at low concentrations in beer because of their scarce solubility in the low-alcohol solutions. See [[Health and safety]].


===Influence on flavor stability===
===Influence on flavor stability===
Line 147: Line 149:


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Amino acids]]
*[[Glycoproteins]]
*[[Glycoproteins]]
*[[Lipid transfer protein]]
*[[Lipid transfer protein]]
Line 153: Line 156:
*[[Foam]]
*[[Foam]]
*[[Haze]]
*[[Haze]]
*[[Amino acids]]
*[[YAN testing]]
*[[Free amino nitrogen]]




To review:
To review:
* [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jib.630 Influence of high molecular weight polypeptides on the mouthfeel of commercial beer.]
* [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jib.630 Influence of high molecular weight polypeptides on the mouthfeel of commercial beer.]
*https://www.themodernbrewhouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/128-131.pdf


==References==
==References==
All contributions to Brewing Forward are released under the CC BY-NC-SA (see Wiki:Copyrights).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: