Low alcohol beer

From Brewing Forward
Revision as of 17:07, 22 May 2022 by Adam (talk | contribs)
This page is in progress
Please check back later for additional changes

Step Mash Method

Step from below 50°C to over 73°C by adding boiling water over a short period of time. The low step increases the protein content (required for fermentation) and the high step causes rapid inactivation of maltose-producing beta amylase. This creates a wort with a very low attenuation limit. Make sure that the mash does not drop below 73°C after increasing the temperature.[1] See Mashing.

In making low-alcohol beers it is usual to mash well-cured malts with caramel malts at high temperatures to minimize saccharification, and so reduce the production of fermentable sugars.[2]

A number of different procedures for manufacturing alcohol-free and low-alcohol beers are available: removal of alcohol by distillation, vacuum distillation, vacuum evaporation, dialysis, reverse osmosis, restricted fermentation, use of special yeasts, production of a wort having a less pronounced flavour, use of spent grains and CO2 extraction.[3] the results of this study have shown the values for the contents of the phenolic compounds in the alcohol-free beers to be lower than the values for the standard beers, attributable to differences in the duration of fermentation and the yeast strains employed in brewing alcohol-free beers (e.g., the case of tyrosol) and to losses brought about by the dealcoholization processes employed (e.g., p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, etc.).


See also

Potential sources

References

  1. Krottenthaler M, Back W, Zarnkow M. Wort production. In: Esslinger HM, ed. Handbook of Brewing: Processes, Technology, Markets. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2009.
  2. Briggs DE, Boulton CA, Brookes PA, Stevens R. Brewing Science and Practice. Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC; 2004.
  3. Bartolomé B, Pena-Neira A, Gómez-Cordovés C. Phenolics and related substances in alcohol-free beers. Eur Food Res Technol. 2000;210(6):419–423.